6 Reasons to oppose
ACTA










  1.    ACTA locks countries into
    obsolete copyright and patent
    laws. If a democracy decides on
    less restrictive laws that reflect
    the reality of the internet, ACTA
    will prevent that.
  2.    ACTA criminalizes users by
    making noncommercial, harmless
    remixes into crimes if "on a
    commercial scale" (art 2.14.1).
    Many amateur works achieve a
    commercial scale on sites like
    Youtube. ACTA, like SOPA, could
    mean jail time for the Justin
    Biebers of the world.
  3.    ACTA Criminalizes legitimate
    websites, making them
    responsible for user behavior by
    "aiding and abetting". (art 2.14.4).
    Like SOPA, the founders of your
    favorite sites could be sued or
    (worse) thrown in jail for
    copyright infringement by their
    users.
  4.    ACTA will let rightsholders use
    laughably inflated claims of
    damages (based on the
    disproven idea that every
    download or stream is a lost sale)
    to sue people. As if suing
    amazing artists, video makers
    and websites for millions wasn't
    hard enough!
  5.    ACTA Permanently bypasses
    democracy by giving the "ACTA
    Committee" the power to
    "propose amendments to [ACTA]"
    (art 6.4). In other words, voting
    for ACTA writes a blank check to
    an unelected committee. These
    closed-door proceedings will be
    a playground for SOPA-
    supporters like the MPAA.
  6.    Trade agreements are a gaping
    loophole, a backdoor track that,
    even though it creates new law,
    is miles removed from
    democracy. It's a secretive
    process that's tailor-made to
    serve politically connected
    companies. And the movie
    studios behind SOPA? They're
    experts at it. If we can't make
    secretive trade agreements
    harder to pass than US law, our
    internet's future belongs to the
    lobbyists behind SOPA.
Know Your History.
Vietnam:
American Holocaust











The United States killed between 3 and 5 million
people in the Vietnam War. This feature looks at
the history of that war and the how and why it
happened using interviews with participates on
both sides, speeches, conversation and actual
wartime footage. Containis graphic volence.
CURRENT MOON
The Future of Food
    Clear explanation of
    how powerful big
    companies have
    become. They don’t
    care about the human
    specy. All they do care
    about is MONEY.
Scott Whitman Show

    Bicycle mechanic by
    day waiter by night
    actor in hart  Aaron
    Maier plays a sofa in a
    very creative and
    funny online comedy   
    Watch it now click
    here!
Miscellaneous:
Movie Of The Week:
See the Full Lenth Movie
Chicago's Other great bike shops
& bike websites.
Thank You for visiting....
Rink A Dink Productions is a non profit
web site. Dedicated to presenting,,,
free music sources, out side artist, and
most important, posting news stories and
article exposing the New World Order,
and its agenda.
There are no paying advertisers
please make a donation of any amount to
help cover the cost of presenting this
web site.

Please
Disclaimer:                                              




ATTENTION:
Rink A Dink Productions
is not affiliated
with Rinkadink Records in any way



thanks
More
Radio
Links
Here
<<<<<
Chicago's Best!    No#1  Great Reviews
Sonia serves up Great Korean dishes at

    Hamburger King
    Restaurant:
    Its not just hamburgers here,
    although the hamburgers are
    really good.. This place doesn't
    look like much from the outside
    but the prices
are reasonable and their Baek Ban, Bi-Bim Bap and Teriyaki is
great as well.
3435 N Sheffield. Ave in (Wriglyville), Chicago
773 281 4452
More about Hamburger King
Click Here!
Amazing! U Must see these videos.
Stop
Telemarketers
from calling you
free
Click Here!
See Van Gogh's
Paintings.
The largest collections on
the Internet tons of
information on one of the
worlds greatest artist
Click Here!
Read Ronnie's Rant
Not the best blog on the net,
but its somthing to read
Click Here!
WHAT ARE CHEMTRAILS? Click Here!
Disclaimer: We believe that all uncredited
images on these pages are in the public
domain. If we have unwittingly infringed
any copyright,
please
let us know
We are in Orwellian times when,







anyone who speaks the truth is
considered to be controversial.
Support Our Troops
doesn't mean to stick a
ribbon on your car...
It means to give real
support to the men and
women  who sacrifice life
and limb.
Learn how to support
those who aren't getting
proper support from the
government who put them
in this situation in the first
place.
NOW!
Support our
troops!
Got a complaint or suggestion?
Write To Rink A Dink Productions
and let me know whats on your mind.
Please let me know about broken links miss
spellings, misinformation etc.
Or  just say hi
Ronnie;
    To contribute to a
    lasting understanding
    between individuals of
    all nations, races,
    creeds and colors
Video:
Martial Law:
Rise of the Police State
Watch It Now!
Dwight David Eisenhower
Farewell Address
On the military-industrial complex and the
government-universities collusion
(17 January 1961)
Rink A Dink Productions
Low Budget Movies
Here are 4 Videos by
Ronnini LoBello,
Ronnini is known for his use
of music blended with the
action and interesting
transitions. Giving the
viewer a bit of a trippie
feeling except for Sara and
Sam's Wedding, this was
edited to provoke both
laughter and crying.
All 3 videos are worth
watching. Just click onto the
thumbnail       
There is a revolution happening in the
farm fields and on the dinner tables of
America that is transforming the very
nature of the food we eat.  This well-
researched documentary by Deborah
Koons Garcia, the widow of the
legendary Grateful Dead guitarist Jerry
Garcia, takes an in-depth look at the
disturbing truth behind the unlabeled,
patented, genetically engineered
foods that have quietly filled U.S.
grocery store shelves for the past
decades.
This film examines the complex web of
market and political forces that are
changing what we eat as huge,
multinational corporations seek to
control the world’s food systems but
also explores alternatives to large-
scale industrial agriculture, offering
solutions like organic and sustainable
agriculture as alternative food
sources.
About the Type-os you might
find in the
Rink A Dink Productions,  
Infozine

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at
Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it
deosn't mttaer in waht oredr
the letters in a word are, the
only iprmoatnt thing is that the
frist and lsat ltteer be at the
rghit pclae. The rset can be a
toatl mses and you can sitll
raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs
is bcuseae the huamn mnid
deos not raed ervey lteter by
istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

But if it still bothers you
please drop me a line.
editor@rinkadinkproductions.com
We The People Radio Network

LISTEN LIVE NOW
FLASH PLAYER
http://www.google.com/imgres?start=113&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=OH4&sa=X&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=963&bih=658&addh=36&tbm=isch&prmd=imvnsu&tbnid=5gDfnSy6_HzoWM:&imgrefurl=http://www.pollythetravelfrog.com/north-america/hanging-out-at-camp-david.php&docid=TgQeo0daAPEWDM&imgurl=http://www.pollythetravelfrog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Camp-David-Close-Up-5by7-e1290342847752.jpg&w=650&h=464&ei=jQBZT-nlJ8m_gAezk6SiCw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=492&vpy=119&dur=1829&hovh=190&hovw=266&tx=159&ty=100&sig=111880176229994118428&page=8&tbnh=144&tbnw=192&ndsp=16&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:113http://www.pollythetravelfrog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Camp-David-Close-Up-5by7-e1290342847752.jpg
A very well built documentary about cannabis and
drug prohibition. Does the drug prohibition work?
Have a look and think for yourself.
The Union;
RFID Microchip implants
cause fast-growing
malignant tumors -- US
chips animals still...?
author: reposter















The US in the mad rush to create a
microwave surveillance society without
any public approval is going to kill off its
farmers--and its people--if the chipping
nonsense ever gets that far. Why? RFID
is cancerous. Detailed articles below.
This should be more well known both for
animal rights and human rights.
Moreover, it should be more well known
because Tommy Thompson is connected
to it--he's a suspect in 9-11 related
Cipro/Anthrax terrorism issues for the
Bush Administration.) Ban animal and
human chipping on health grounds if
human and animal rights issues aren't
good enough for you. To farmers,
various states are starting to require
you to chip your animals--this means you
are going to endanger and kill your
livestock, livelihoods, and yourself.
Spread the word. Forward to a farmer
you want to save. NO MORE 'CANCER
CHIPS.' SAVE YOURSELF AND YOUR
ANIMALS FROM 'CHIP CANCER.' It's
already illegal in Wisconsin as well as
California to force human chipping.

The next step is to save our pets, other
animals, and feedstock from excessive
cancer--that will get passed to the
consumer.

Once the consumer knows that RFID
chipping creates cancer, they will
DEMAND an unchipped food supply and
an unchipped child. Commentary
throughout the articles below in
brackets.

(Aticles)
Recommended
News links
to the best
journalism on
the web.

Open and fair
journalism
is very
essential to a
free and
democratic
society

Please
visit and
support the
news
organizations
to the
left
Thank You
from the
editor of
Rink-a-Dink
Productions
clocksforweb para tus Pisos!
Rink A Dink productions by Ronnie LoBello. A GREAT place for alternative art, music, news and lots of cool links too...
Trivia:
Did you know
The Pentagon, a building, institution, and
symbol, was conceived at the request of
Brigadier General Brehon B. Sommervell,
Chief of the Construction Division of the
Office of the Quartermaster General, on a
weekend in mid-July 1941. The purpose was
to provide a temporary solution to the War
Department's critical shortage of space.
The ground breaking ceremony took place on
September 11, 1941. The building was
dedicated on January 15, 1943, nearly 16
months to the day after the ground breaking.
Television;
" ... so long as the media are in corporate hands,
the task of social change will be vastly more
difficult, if not impossible ..."
Robert McChesney, journalist and author
Article;            Watch video
Fascist America, in 10 easy steps
By Naomi Wolf
From Hitler to Pinochet and beyond, history shows
there are certain steps that any would-be dictator
must take to destroy constitutional freedoms. And
George Bush and his administration seem to be
taking them all...  
Continue Here !
Confronting the Surveillance
Society
Talk by James Bamford author of "The Puzzle
Palace" and "Body of Secrets" & Chris Calabrese
Program Counsel of the ACLU Technology and
Liberty Project
Are We Free?
Chicago's Parking Meter Revolt
The Government Dark Side
About the Gorilla in the Livingroom
Should the World Bring Bush and
Cheney to Trial?

Vincent Bugliosi has expressed recent exasperation
over the issue of torture being mentioned currently
with greater frequency over what the former L.A.
County prosecutor believes to be the key issue over
which George W. Bush and Dick Cheney should face
trial -- murder.

































Bugliosi's concern, through which he urges action
from an American prosecutorial body to bring Bush
and Cheney to trial, could be directly addressed
through the international tribunal of the International
Court of Justice at The Hague.
A reputable source of keeping up to date about the
number of Iraqi civilians killed since the initial "shock
and awe"- attacks on Baghdad ordered by Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld prior to occupying that
city and the nation of Iraq is Just Foreign Policy. This
informative site provides international detailed
analysis of significant events throughout the world.
Just Foreign Policy publishes numbers based on the
highly respected international medical journal The
Lancet. According to The Lancet's detailed continuing
study, supportive evidence of which is supplied by
Just Foreign Policy, the current death figure is much
higher than that reported by America's mainstream
media on those rare occasions when any such
information is presented.

A current check of Just Foreign Policy reveals the
Iraqi civilian death toll following the U.S. invasion to
be 1,320,110. The continuing study of The Lancet
reveals that 600,000 Iraqi civilians had been killed by
July 2006 with the remainder of more than double
occurring
in the less than three years since then.

A major area of misunderstanding arising even
among progressives opposing the war has been the
labeling within the mainstream media and elsewhere
of the conflict as "pre-emptive war."- Under the rules
that governed the Nuremberg Trials, the UN Charter,
and other recognized international bodies,
pre-emptive war is international legal terminology for
legitimate self-defense and is permissible.

The rule governing pre-emptive war is akin to the
famous First Amendment principle enunciated in the
Supreme Court by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes of
"clear and present danger."- Under the pre-emptive
war concept a nation faces reasonable imminent
threat from a foreign invader and under those
circumstances possesses a right to attack based on a
principle of self-defense.

Bush-Cheney propagandists have been successful in
being able to make the term pre-emptive war stick
when in reality the issue is that of preventive war,
which is clearly illegal under international law.

The brilliant two hour opening presentation by U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson at the main
Nuremberg Trial involving the leading figures of Nazi
Germany was centered on connecting German Fuhrer
Adolf Hitler with specific plans to attack Poland and
England. Jackson sought to link Hitler and his regime
with European aggression through preventive war,
that which is indefensible under international law.

Recently there has been talk from certain UN sources
that if after that body's own investigation concludes
that U.S. leadership engaged in such aggressive
preventive war along with unjustifiable torture tactics
and the hunting down of victims without recourse to
the law, then arrests could be made on U.S. soil.

On this rationale such arrests could be made without
the U.S. government being involved in any way,
obviating any necessity of action on the part of
congressional bodies or U.S. courts.

Should George W. Bush be so approached in a
specific effort to arrest him under international law, it
has been noted that he is accompanied by armed U.S.
Secret Service agents to protect him.

To use a term from a sport President Barack Obama
loves to play and watch, basketball, "The ball would
be in his court"- and the crucial and ultimately
decisive question of whether he would be willing
under those circumstances to order Bush's Secret
Service detail to "stand down"- in the interest of
international law.


Began in the journalism field in hometown of Los
Angeles. Started as Sports Editor and Movie Writer at
Inglewood Daily News chain after working in
sportswriting of high school events at the Los
Angeles Examiner. Received a bachelor's in (more...)
Obama and the global elite
Obama’s Drone Escalation War Crime?











President Obama is pursuing a dangerous and
reckless course of action in Pakistan hoping to get
a lucky kill on a top level terrorist that he can turn
into political domestic advantage. While the Obama
administration is complaining about the Bush
administration giving a few admitted terrorists
some pain, his reckless policy of escalating drone
attacks in Pakistan has falsely claimed to have killed
many terrorists but instead has only inflamed the
Pakistani population against the U.S. Ironically his
decisions may put him at risk of being labeled a war
criminal by the international community.
Read complete story
HERE!
Silent Screams: The Impact of
U.S. Drone Attacks











Silent Screams deftly interweaves exclusive
footage of tribal villagers in Iran with families in
neighboring Afghanistan and Pakistan. Explicit
scenes detail civilian suffering in war-torn
Afghanistan and Pakistan as a result of
bombardments by drones, 'unmanned aerial
vehicles' controlled remotely by pilots thousands of
miles away inside the U.S. Spotlighting the
destructive costs of U.S. wars, this documentary
adroitly binds the plight of civilian victims abroad
with the countless Americans whose vital needs go
unmet as a result of spiraling military spending.
Silent Screams echoes the desperation around the
globe for victims without a voice. Visit
www.silentscreams.info for information and
educational kits to cultivate action and demand real
change in how your tax dollars are spen
War Crimes!
War Crimes!
March  2012
Consequences To
Expect If The U.S.
Invades Iran
by Brandon Smith    Activist Post February 19, 2012

Let’s be honest, quite a few Americans love a good
war, especially those Americans who have never had
to bear witness to one first hand.  War is the ultimate
tribally vicarious experience.  Anyone, even pudgy
armchair generals with deep-seated feelings of
personal inadequacy, can revel in the victories and
actions of armies a half a world away as if they
themselves stood on the front lines risking possible
annihilation at the hands of dastardly cartoon-land “evil
doers”.  They may have never done a single worthwhile
thing in their lives, but at least they can bask in the
perceived glory of their country’s military might.

This attitude of swollen ego through proxy is not
limited to the “Right” side of the political spectrum as
some might expect.  In fact, if the terrifyingly demented
presidency of Barack Obama has proven anything so
far, it is that elements of the “Left” are just as
bloodthirsty as any NeoCon, and just as ready to blindly
support the political supremacy of their “side”
regardless of any broken promises, abandoned
principles, or openly flaunted hypocrisies.  No matter
how reasonable or irrefutable the arguments against a
particular conflict are, there will always be a certain
percentage of the populace which ignores all logic and
barrels forward to cheerlead violent actions which
ultimately only benefit a select and elite few.

They do this, though they rarely openly admit it,
because of unbalanced and irrational biases which
drive their decision making processes.  In the case of
the wars in the Middle East, the common public
argument boils down to one of “self defense”.  “They
are coming to get us!”  At least, that is what we are
constantly told.  And I’m sure that some Americans out
there truly believe this.  However, in their heart of
hearts, others instead relish the idea of imposing their
world views and philosophical systems upon others,
even if it means using cluster bombs and predator
drones.


Some people simply hate Muslims, for one reason or
another.  Some people believe that war will bring with
it economic gain.  Some are so afraid of what they do
not comprehend that they only feel secure by attacking
it.  Some believe that the U.S. citizenry is morally
obligated to become entangled with governments like
Israel’s, and support them without question as if they
are infallible, though they are often just as corrupt as
the governments we are directed to despise.  And yet
others (for religious purposes), actually clamor for
Middle Eastern destruction in the desperate hopes
that their version of biblical prophecy will be
vindicated.  Ultimately, most Americans who support
continued destruction in the Middle East, or anywhere
else for that matter, do so out a selfish need for private
absolution and elevation, not out of a sincere sense of
patriotism, and not because nations like Afghanistan,
Iraq, Libya, or Iran present a legitimate danger to their
safety.

These men and women have invested their very
identities into the mechanizations of collective war.  
They will not be swayed by evidence or honorable
arguments.  Any criticism of the actions of the
collective will immediately be treated as a personal
attack on their individual character, causing their
minds to shut down completely.

As far as Iran is concerned, I am not here to convince
the war-drum pounding zombie hordes infesting the
mentally impotent sewage-soaked wastelands of my
country that their rationalizations for raining laser
guided death on the Third World is a “reprehensible
thing”.  Given their impenetrable biases, which I listed
above, that would be a complete waste of time.

I could, indeed, point out how in 1953 the U.S. and
Britain overthrew the democratically elected leader of
Iran, Mohammad Mossaddegh, because he refused to
allow global corporate interests to exploit his country’s
oil resources.  I could outline how the forced CIA
installation of the Shah in Iran and the creation of his
secret police led to the torture and murder of
thousands of innocent people.  I could list similar
covert activities over the past 100 years or so, in
countries all over the world, which have created the
now universal disdain the Third World has for the U.S.
government.  I could even show them a PBS special
from 1987 which effectively details this history and
warns of what is now going on today.  The kind of
mainstream news coverage that networks currently
blacklist honest and daring journalists for: But what
about all the nuclear talk being shoved down our
throats lately?  Doesn’t this supersede any historical
concerns between Iran and the U.S.?  What if the
terrorists get their hands on “the bomb”?!

On this issue, I could easily interject the fact that
countries supposedly hostile to the U.S., like North
Korea, have long had nuclear capability, and certainly
the means to use infiltrators to deliver that technology,
yet, we haven’t sent the Western war machine after
them.  I would also set the record straight by
mentioning that the only country in the world that has
used a nuclear weapon against another is the United
States.  I could educate these people on the exposure
of secret Israeli nuclear weapons programs since the
1970s, and the fact that Israel even attempted to
illegally sell this technology to Apartheid South Africa.
(Source)

I could try to clear the air by reminding the uninformed
that Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, recently
admitted that Iran has no nuclear weapons capability.  
And, that this fact was repeated by an Iranian nuclear
scientist, Sharhram Amiri, who defected to the U.S. in
2010 with the help of the CIA in the hopes that he could
be used to disseminate propaganda on “secret”
nuclear weapons programs in his former homeland.  
Instead, he only reinforced the assertion that there are
no such programs. (Source)

With the CIA made to look foolish, they have now
decided that Amiri is “peripheral” to the Iranian nuke
programs, and is no longer a solid source of
information.  I could follow by pointing out how
decidedly convenient this is….

What about all the similarities between the lies on WMD’
s in Iraq and the rhetoric against Iran today?  What
about the disinformation put forward by the IAEA and
its cadre of foreign policy yes-men?What about the fact
that back when Iran was run by our own puppet leader,
the Shah, an iron-fisted sociopathic dictator, we were
more than happy that the country was developing
nuclear power plants.

Sorry, but sharing this information with the
warmongering percentage of our American culture is
futile.  None of this data means a thing to them.  For
these people, it’s not about facts; it’s about foggy
perception, uncontrolled emotion, and false identity.  
Understanding the situation only complicates their
pursuit of the next collectivist high; that frenetic freak
frenzy that takes hold of a population and makes them
swarm like mad bees, or hungry piranha, poisoning and
devouring everything in their path.

With this in mind, the only recourse I could possibly
think of to wake them up to their philosophical and
moral folly is to expose them to very real and
debilitating consequences they will face in their
everyday lives in the wake of expanded conflict on the
part of the U.S.  That is to say, you may hate Iran, you
may hate Iranians, you may despise Muslims, you may
be driven by a childish need to live vicariously through
the exploits of your government, or, you might actually
believe the hype that Iran is in league with Al-Qaeda,
that they really are after nuclear weapons in a
diabolical plot to harm Americans, and you might truly
believe that Israel is that “beacon of freedom” in the
Middle East and that all its neighbors must be pacified
for the sake of democracy.  At bottom, whatever your
deepest intentions, and whatever you might think, this
is irrelevant in the face of the inevitable costs of war.  
If you support such a war, here is how it will affect you
when it breaks loose:

Exploding Oil Prices

The U.S. has had a ban on Iranian oil imports since
1979, however, Iran still supplies about 5% of the global
oil market.  This might not seem like much, but Iran also
has the means and ability to shut down the Strait of
Hormuz, which is one of two major petroleum choke
points in the world.  Around 17 million barrels of oil per
day are shipped through the Straight of Hormuz, or
about 20% of all oil traded worldwide.In 2006, during the
last major Iran war scare, experts predicted gasoline
price increases in excess of $10 a gallon if Iran was
invaded. (Source)


















This would devastate the U.S. economy, which is
already hanging by a thin thread.  Iran has announced
this past weekend it will cease all oil shipments to
Britain and France in protest of their support of
economic sanctions.  This alone is causing oil to spike
today.  A global energy crisis will financially decimate
average citizens who will have their savings sapped by
extreme price inflation, not just in gasoline, but in all
goods that require the use of gasoline in their
production and shipping.  If you like this idea, then by
all means, support an invasion of Iran.

War Domino Effect

In January of 2010, I wrote an article for Neithercorp
Press entitled “Will Globalists Trigger Yet Another
World War”.  In that article, I warned about the dangers
of an invasion of Iran or Syria being used to foment a
global conflict, in order to create a crisis large enough
to distract the masses away from the international
banker created economic collapse. (Source)

In 2006, Iran signed a mutual defense pact with its
neighbor, Syria, which is also in the middle of its own
turmoil and possible NATO intervention.  Syria has
strong ties to Russia, and even has a revamped
Russian naval base off its coast, a fact rarely
mentioned by the mainstream media.  Both Russia and
China have made their opposition clear in the case of
any Western intervention in Iran or Syria.  An invasion
by the U.S. or Israel in these regions could quickly
intensify into wider war between major world powers.  
If you like the idea of a world war which could
eventually put you and your family in direct danger,
then by all means, support an invasion of Iran.

Dollar Collapse

Make no mistake, the U.S. dollar is already on the
verge of collapse, along with the U.S. economy.  
Bilateral trade agreements between BRIC and ASEAN
nations are sprouting up everywhere the past couple
months, and these agreements are specifically
designed to end the dollar’s status as the world
reserve currency.  An invasion of Iran will only
expedite this process.  If global anger over the
resulting chaos in oil prices doesn’t set off a dump of
the dollar, the eventual debt obligation incurred
through the overt costs of war will.  Ron Paul has
always been right; it doesn’t matter whether you think
invasion is a good idea or not.  We simply cannot afford
it.  America is bankrupt.  Our only source of income is
our ability to print money from thin air.  Each dollar
created to fund new wars brings our currency ever
closer to its demise.

This combination of disastrous economic policy and
disastrous foreign policy has actually been used
before.  Great Britain once sat in the position of
economic authority that the U.S. sits in today, and the
pound sterling was once considered the world reserve
because it was required in the global trade of oil, just
as the dollar is now.  However, British intrigues in the
Middle East, and more specifically in Egypt, led them
into extreme debt.  In the 1940s and 1950s,
international banks led by America and France
threatened to dump British Treasury Bonds in
response to their efforts to dominate Middle Eastern
oil.  Does any of this sound familiar?  This ultimately led
to considerable devaluation of the pound.  In 1967, the
death blow was finally delivered when Prime Minister,
Harold Wilson, artificially reduced the British exchange
rate by 14% overnight!  Meaning, in the span of a single
evening, British citizens lost 14% of their buying power,
and every product they went out to buy the next day
would cost them 14% more.

It would be practical to mention that the move to
destroy the British pound came right in time for the
implementation of new programs for the construction
of the European Union, and the Euro, the new
supranational currency which would later become the
standard.  The EU and the Euro never could have come
about while the Pound Sterling remained a world
reserve.  Just another amazing coincidence I’m sure,
and one that couldn’t possibly have any relation to
what is happening to the dollar in 2012, right…?

So, if you like the idea of losing 14% or more of your
buying power overnight, and having that financial loss
blamed on the tides of war, rather than on the
corporate bankers who actually created the mess, then
by all means, support an invasion of Iran.

Civil Liberties Destroyed

Do you like being able to walk down the street without
having to suffer through constant pat-downs by low-
wage brain-dead cretins in blue gloves?  Does it make
you feel good to know that if you are ever arrested,
whether you are guilty or not, you are guaranteed by
law to receive a fair trial by your peers in a civilian
court with a lawyer by your side?  Do you enjoy taking a
long drive with the family without facing checkpoints,
and predator drones constantly overhead every time
you put the top down to feel the wind in your hair?  Don’
t get too comfortable, folks!  These “luxuries” will soon
be a thing of the past, especially as the U.S. financial
situation deteriorates and war escalates.  Think of all
the new threats the elites in our government can use
to rationalize the usurpation of Constitutional
protections when war with Iran, or Syria, or Russia, or
China, or all of them at once, breaks out.

The term “terrorist” will take on a whole different
dynamic.  Great national dangers often facilitate
broader definitions of who is and who is not an “enemy
of the state”.  Crisis gives wings to legislation like the
NDAA.  In this kind of despotic environment, no one,
even those citizens who support the state in nearly all
of its enterprises, is safe.  Maybe you love the idea of
war with Iran, but at the same time, hate the idea of
having a TSA goon manhandling your wife or daughter
in a train station or on a street corner.  Good luck with
that.  Speaking out could be treated as disruption of
national security measures.  Off to the gulag with you!

The “greater good” somehow always entails the
dissolution of civil liberties for the common man.  
Invariably, the establishment in power favors no one,
save a highly connected few.  Being pro-establishment
does not necessarily protect you from a government
given free reign to do whatever it pleases in wartime.  
In the end, everyone is fair game.

If this is the kind of America you want to live in, by all
means, support an invasion of Iran.

If You Can’t See The Big Picture, You Can’t See A
Thing…

The relentless drive for war in the Middle East is not
about “spreading democracy”.  It is not about
terrorism.  It is not about oil (at least for the most part).  
It is not about Israel (at least, not the Israeli people).  It
is not even about corporate profiteering by the Military
Industrial Complex.  War in the Middle East is about
changing the way our country and our world operates,
culturally, socially, financially, and politically.  War
opens doors to social re-engineering that could never
be accomplished otherwise.  War creates fear, panic,
rage, and allows dystopian fallacies to reign supreme.  
War, unjust and dishonorable war, makes countries
weak, and ripe for violent change.

Iran is not a threat to our way of life, and never has
been.  But, war in Iran could easily upset the core of
our entire country, and leave us wayward strangers in
the land we were born.

While much of the rhetoric of preemptive invasion that
America has been awash in these past few months is
carefully crafted and disseminated by government
entities whose intentions are far from honest, its
effectiveness is mute without the helping hand of a
thoughtless subsection of the public.  Every decade or
so, a new generation of idiot spawn comes of age to be
willingly sacrificed on the chopping block of globalist
conquest.  This new decade brings with it the promise
of not just more of the same, but perhaps the most
costly tithe to the gods of war ever made in our country’
s history.  This is not our fight.  This is a fight we are
being conned into undertaking for the profit of others,
and thus, it is a fight we cannot win.  Perhaps when the
blind mobs of this nation feel the abrupt sting of their
foolishness in their narrow day-to-day existence, they
will finally understand….
WikiLeaks to release
more than five million
emails from
intelligence firm
Stratfor
REUTERS





















The anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks began publishing on
Monday more than five million emails from a U.S.-based
global security analysis company that has been likened
to a shadow CIA.

The emails, snatched by hackers, could unmask
sensitive sources and throw light on the murky world of
intelligence-gathering by the company known as
Stratfor, which counts Fortune 500 companies among its
subscribers.

Stratfor in a statement shortly after midnight EST said
the release of its stolen emails was an attempt to silence
and intimidate it.

It said it would not be cowed under the leadership of
George Friedman, Stratfor’s founder and chief executive
officer. It said Friedman had not resigned as CEO,
contrary to a bogus email circulating on the Internet.

Some of the emails being published “may be forged or
altered to include inaccuracies; some may be authentic,”
the company statement said.

“We will not validate either. Nor will we explain the
thinking that went into them. Having had our property
stolen, we will not be victimized twice by submitting to
questioning about them,” the statement said.

WikiLeaks did not say how it had acquired access to the
vast haul of internal and external correspondence of the
Austin, Texas company, formally known as Strategic
Forecasting Inc.

Hackers linked to the loosely organized Anonymous
hackers group said at the beginning of the year they had
stolen the email correspondence of some 100 of the firm’
s employees. The group said it planned to publish the
data so the public would know the “truth” about Stratfor
operations.

Stratfor describes itself as a subscription-based
publisher of geopolitical analysis with an intelligence-
based approach to gathering information.

WikiLeaks and Anonymous maintain the emails will
expose dark secrets about the company. Stratfor said in
its statement it had worked hard to build “good sources”
in many countries, “as any publisher of global
geopolitical analysis would do.”

In December, hackers broke into Stratfor’s data systems
and stole a large number of company emails.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told Reuters: “Here
we have a private intelligence firm, relying on
informants from the U.S. government, foreign
intelligence agencies with questionable reputations and
journalists.”

“What is of grave concern is that the targets of this
scrutiny are, among others, activist organizations
fighting for a just cause.”

Friedman, the chief executive, said on Jan. 11 the
thieves would be hard pressed to find anything
significant in the stolen emails.

“God knows what a hundred employees writing endless
emails might say that is embarrassing, stupid or subject
to misinterpretation. … As they search our emails for
signs of a vast conspiracy, they will be disappointed.”

MEDIA PARTNERS

People linked to Anonymous took credit for the data
theft. “Congrats on the amazing partnership between
#Anonymous and #WikiLeaks to make all 5 million mails
public,” AnonSec Tweeted. AnonSec is one of several
Twitter accounts used to promote and organize activities
associated with Anonymous.

It was not immediately clear what impact the release of
the emails might have on Stratfor, its employees, clients
and information sources.

Previous releases from WikiLeaks, such as secret video
battle footage and thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables
about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, in 2010 have
angered the U.S. government. WikiLeaks’ disclosures
also have raised questions about the safety of
confidential sources quoted in previously secret
documents.

WikiLeaks said it was working with two dozen media
organizations worldwide that have access to a database
of the Stratfor emails. These include the U.S. newspaper
publisher McClatchy Co..

“We have begun reviewing the emails and will publish
as warranted,” McClatchy’s Washington bureau chief,
James Asher, told Reuters.

WikiLeaks said its other media partners include L’
Espresso and La Repubblica newspapers in Italy, the
NDR/ARD state broadcaster in Germany and Russia
Reporter.

The group gave a sneak preview of the emails to The
Yes Men, an activist group that targets what it views as
corporate greed.

The Stratfor emails discuss an elaborate hoax the group
staged to criticize Dow Chemical Co’s handling of the
Bhopal chemical disaster in India, according to Andy
Bichlbaum, one of The Yes Men.

“What is significant is the picture it helps to paint of the
way corporations operate,” Bichlbaum told Reuters.
“They operate with complete disregard for rule of law
and human decency.”

After Stratfor’s computers were hacked at least twice
last December, the credit card details of more than
30,000 subscribers to Stratfor publications were posted
on the Internet, including those of former U.S. secretary
of state Henry Kissinger and former U.S. vice president
Dan Quayle.

The FBI began investigating the matter in December.

Australian-born Assange, 40, is currently under house
arrest in Britain and fighting extradition to Sweden for
questioning over alleged sex crimes.

© Thomson Reuters 2012
Live Stream Feed from the
noNATO Protest in Chicago
Up to date News
on the NATO
summit meeting in
Chicago @
NATOprotest.org
    
Click Here!
Why We Protest
This May, the military, financial and political leaders
who serve the 1% domestically and abroad will meet
in Chicago to scheme on behalf of the elites they
serve. The rest of us -- the 99% forced to bankroll
these elites’ agendas – have NOT been invited.

At the behest of the White House, Chicago agreed
to host two international summits from May 19-21 at
McCormick Place: NATO, the 28-nation, U.S.-
commanded and largely U.S.-financed North Atlantic
Treaty Organization; and the G8, a forum for the
governments of eight of the world's largest
economies -- France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the
United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and
Russia.

While the Obama administration decided to 'move'
the G8 meeting to secluded -- and barricaded --
Camp David in March, these meetings remain
deeply entwined. These same G8 ‘leaders’ are
imposing harsh austerity measures on working
people across the planet, from Spain and Greece to
Egypt and the United States. Their agenda? To
expand the neoliberal assault on economic and
social safety nets, public health care and public
education, the right to collectively bargain –
anything that might impede big corporations’ ability
to maximize profits at the expense of the rest of us.

Those corporate interests have a military wing, too:
NATO, which is bankrolled largely by G8 dollars,
particularly U.S. taxpayers. NATO’s military muscle
imposes the G8 agenda – from Iraq and Afghanistan
to North Africa and Iran. The beneficiaries? Big
corporations that can access the oil and mineral
wealth of nations like Iraq and Libya. The losers are
inevitably ordinary people in these countries, who
are bombed, starved, maimed and murdered as part
of NATO military campaigns.

This May, thousands of people will gather in
Chicago -- and wherever the NATO/G8 elites meet --
to oppose the tyranny of the banks and the
corporate elites – to oppose the corporate war on
our wages, our homes, our health care, our
education and our right to speak out and protest. In
meetings, marches, teach-ins, pickets, protests –
the host of ways people organize – we’re gathering
this spring to oppose the 1% agenda at home and
abroad, and to affirm that another world is possible.

We are uninvited, but we will not be dispossessed.
Join us.