| OUTFOXED :Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism Outfoxed examines how media empires, led by Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, have been running a "race to the bottom" in television news. This film provides an in-depth look at Fox News and the dangers of ever-enlarging corporations taking control of the public's right to know. High Definition version |
| Trivia: Did you know The Pentagon, a building, institution, and symbol, was conceived at the request of Brigadier General Brehon B. Sommervell, Chief of the Construction Division of the Office of the Quartermaster General, on a weekend in mid-July 1941. The purpose was to provide a temporary solution to the War Department's critical shortage of space. The ground breaking ceremony took place on September 11, 1941. The building was dedicated on January 15, 1943, nearly 16 months to the day after the ground breaking. |
The Future of Food
how powerful big companies have become. They don’t care about the human specy. All they do care about is MONEY. |
| Scott Whitman Show Bicycle mechanic by day waiter by night actor in hart Aaron Maier plays a sofa in a very creative and funny online comedy Watch it now click here! |
| Miscellaneous: |


| Thank You for visiting.... Rink A Dink Productions is a non profit web site. Dedicated to presenting,,, free music sources, out side artist, and most important, posting news stories and article exposing the New World Order, and its agenda. There are no paying advertisers please make a donation of any amount to help cover the cost of presenting this web site. Please |
| Disclaimer: ATTENTION: Rink A Dink Productions is not affiliated with Rinkadink Records in any way thanks |
| Rink A Dink productions by Ronnie LoBello. A GREAT place for alternative art, music, news and lots of cool links too... |

| Chicago's Best! No#1 Great Reviews Sonia serves up Great Korean dishes at Hamburger King Restaurant: Its not just hamburgers here, although the hamburgers are really good.. This place doesn't look like much from the outside but the prices great as well. 3435 N Sheffield. Ave in (Wriglyville), Chicago 773 281 4452 More about Hamburger King Click Here! |
| Stop Telemarketers from calling you free Click Here! |
| Legalize marijuana In New York, we spend about $1 billion on marijuana enforcement, not including long-term jailing. With a $13 billion budget gap, why not save ourselves the money and shift to a legalization, regulation and taxation policies similar to that of alcohol? There are also the documented health benefits afforded to suffering AIDS and cancer patients forced to go into a dangerous underground market to get what many feel is their medicine. Luckily, New York is at least taking the medicinal uses seriously, as shown by bills in the Assembly (A0576) and Senate (S. 4041-A). Contact your state legislators. Tell them we cannot afford current marijuana laws, and urge them to support their respective bills. As a person acquainted with two people suffering from cancer, I believe it's a shame they cannot legally obtain a drug that has been shown to improve the quality of life while they go through their treatments. Shaun Bowen Owego |


| See Van Gogh's Paintings. The largest collections on the Internet tons of information on one of the worlds greatest artist Click Here! |
| Read Ronnie's Rant Not the best blog on the net, but its somthing to read Click Here! |
| Disclaimer: We believe that all uncredited images on these pages are in the public domain. If we have unwittingly infringed any copyright, please let us know |
| We are in Orwellian times when, anyone who speaks the truth is considered to be controversial. |
| Are We Free? |
| Support Our Troops doesn't mean to stick a ribbon on your car... It means to give real support to the men and women who sacrifice life and limb. Learn how to support those who aren't getting proper support from the government who put them in this situation in the first place. NOW! Support our troops! |
| Got a complaint or suggestion? Write To Rink A Dink Productions and let me know whats on your mind. Please let me know about broken links miss spellings, misinformation etc. Or just say hi Ronnie; |
lasting understanding between individuals of all nations, races, creeds and colors |
| AN RFID IN EVERY LIVING CREATURE -- BY LAW Read More Here! Say No To The National Animal Indenafication System click here Stop the NAIS by Ron Paul |
| About the Gorilla in the Livingroom Should the World Bring Bush and Cheney to Trial? Vincent Bugliosi has expressed recent exasperation over the issue of torture being mentioned currently with greater frequency over what the former L.A. County prosecutor believes to be the key issue over which George W. Bush and Dick Cheney should face trial -- murder. Bugliosi's concern, through which he urges action from an American prosecutorial body to bring Bush and Cheney to trial, could be directly addressed through the international tribunal of the International Court of Justice at The Hague. A reputable source of keeping up to date about the number of Iraqi civilians killed since the initial "shock and awe"- attacks on Baghdad ordered by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld prior to occupying that city and the nation of Iraq is Just Foreign Policy. This informative site provides international detailed analysis of significant events throughout the world. Just Foreign Policy publishes numbers based on the highly respected international medical journal The Lancet. According to The Lancet's detailed continuing study, supportive evidence of which is supplied by Just Foreign Policy, the current death figure is much higher than that reported by America's mainstream media on those rare occasions when any such information is presented. A current check of Just Foreign Policy reveals the Iraqi civilian death toll following the U.S. invasion to be 1,320,110. The continuing study of The Lancet reveals that 600,000 Iraqi civilians had been killed by July 2006 with the remainder of more than double occurring in the less than three years since then. A major area of misunderstanding arising even among progressives opposing the war has been the labeling within the mainstream media and elsewhere of the conflict as "pre-emptive war."- Under the rules that governed the Nuremberg Trials, the UN Charter, and other recognized international bodies, pre-emptive war is international legal terminology for legitimate self-defense and is permissible. The rule governing pre-emptive war is akin to the famous First Amendment principle enunciated in the Supreme Court by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes of "clear and present danger."- Under the pre-emptive war concept a nation faces reasonable imminent threat from a foreign invader and under those circumstances possesses a right to attack based on a principle of self-defense. Bush-Cheney propagandists have been successful in being able to make the term pre-emptive war stick when in reality the issue is that of preventive war, which is clearly illegal under international law. The brilliant two hour opening presentation by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson at the main Nuremberg Trial involving the leading figures of Nazi Germany was centered on connecting German Fuhrer Adolf Hitler with specific plans to attack Poland and England. Jackson sought to link Hitler and his regime with European aggression through preventive war, that which is indefensible under international law. Recently there has been talk from certain UN sources that if after that body's own investigation concludes that U.S. leadership engaged in such aggressive preventive war along with unjustifiable torture tactics and the hunting down of victims without recourse to the law, then arrests could be made on U.S. soil. On this rationale such arrests could be made without the U.S. government being involved in any way, obviating any necessity of action on the part of congressional bodies or U.S. courts. Should George W. Bush be so approached in a specific effort to arrest him under international law, it has been noted that he is accompanied by armed U.S. Secret Service agents to protect him. To use a term from a sport President Barack Obama loves to play and watch, basketball, "The ball would be in his court"- and the crucial and ultimately decisive question of whether he would be willing under those circumstances to order Bush's Secret Service detail to "stand down"- in the interest of international law. Began in the journalism field in hometown of Los Angeles. Started as Sports Editor and Movie Writer at Inglewood Daily News chain after working in sportswriting of high school events at the Los Angeles Examiner. Received a bachelor's in (more...) |

| Dwight David Eisenhower Farewell Address On the military-industrial complex and the government-universities collusion (17 January 1961) |
| clocksforweb para tus Pisos! |

| About the Type-os you might find in the Rink A Dink Productions, Infozine Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the letters in a word are, the only iprmoatnt thing is that the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. But if it still bothers you please drop me a line. editor@rinkadinkproductions.com |

| RFID Microchip implants cause fast-growing malignant tumors -- US chips animals still...? author: reposter The US in the mad rush to create a microwave surveillance society without any public approval is going to kill off its farmers--and its people--if the chipping nonsense ever gets that far. Why? RFID is cancerous. Detailed articles below. This should be more well known both for animal rights and human rights. Moreover, it should be more well known because Tommy Thompson is connected to it--he's a suspect in 9-11 related Cipro/Anthrax terrorism issues for the Bush Administration.) Ban animal and human chipping on health grounds if human and animal rights issues aren't good enough for you. To farmers, various states are starting to require you to chip your animals--this means you are going to endanger and kill your livestock, livelihoods, and yourself. Spread the word. Forward to a farmer you want to save. NO MORE 'CANCER CHIPS.' SAVE YOURSELF AND YOUR ANIMALS FROM 'CHIP CANCER.' It's already illegal in Wisconsin as well as California to force human chipping. The next step is to save our pets, other animals, and feedstock from excessive cancer--that will get passed to the consumer. Once the consumer knows that RFID chipping creates cancer, they will DEMAND an unchipped food supply and an unchipped child. Commentary throughout the articles below in brackets. (Aticles) |

| Julian Assange Courageous Hero or Terrorist?
Julian Assange emerged in China, Iran or perhaps another country that the American government regards as authoritarian and repressive, he would probably be hailed as a courageous fighter against tyranny. NEWS ANALYSIS Since his revelations have stung the shapers of American policies at home and abroad, he is labeled an “anarchist,” a “terrorist” and Wikileaks, the not-for-profit media organization he directs is under attack. Kimber Heinz, national organizing coordinator for the New York based War Resisters League sees the crackdown on Mr. Assange coming from U.S. officials as another way of the U.S. creating a new definition of terrorism to include anyone who criticizes the American government's foreign or domestic policy. “Since U.S. policy is taking militarism up a notch every chance it can get whether it be in our communities or parts of central and south Asia then anyone who is trying to work against that either by releasing documents or working in organizations against those policies is going to be labeled a terrorist,” Ms. Heinz told The Final Call. In a view shared by many across the globe, the Nation of Islam's UK representative Hilary Muhammad said the sexual assault charges against Julian Assange are “trumped up.” Mr. Muhammad said it brought tears to his eyes when he saw Mr. Assange being taken into police custody. “He (Assange) reminded me of one who is following in the footsteps of divine because he is willing to pick up his cross and carry it. He has access to all of that information knowing that it would serve the public interests, and knowing in advance that he would have governments opposing him. He still was willing to take the responsibility of being opposed by government to inform the masses,” said Mr. Muhammad. “The information being published is all in the public's interest, and when you juxtapose that with the amount of gossip and slander and false accusations—nothing that has been published has been refuted as false,” he added. “It seems to me the reaction is kill the messenger, forget the message,” said Hodari Abdul-Ali, chairman of the Social Justice Task Force for the Muslim Alliance in North America. “The political witch-hunt against (Mr. Assange) is so transparently ridiculous, I'm pretty sure it is going to backfire,” he added. As opposed to the controlled U.S. media which has focused primarily on the case against Mr. Assange and his arrest, foreign media such as Press TV, Al- Jazeera and Der Spiegel are emphasizing the actual details of the Wikileaks Cablegate files. Activists like Mr. Abdul-Ali, Ms. Heinz and others who monitor foreign media believe this is critical in understanding the long-range impact of the Wikileaks revelations. “The outcry in non-U.S. countries is a lot louder and a lot stronger than we see in the U.S.,” said Ms. Heniz. “In other countries, the media is much more focused on how the U.S. is handling it, but also what the U.S. did and are holding the U.S. accountable.” There have also been numerous protests by anti- censorship activists on behalf of Mr. Assange worldwide. Internet activists have mounted denial of service attacks against PayPal, Visa, MasterCard and PostFinance, all financial institutions that cut off Wikileaks' ability to receive donations from the public. Control of Africa detailed in files Whether using religion, economics, or outright racism, Western imperialism has always been on display when it comes to its dealings with the African continent. Whether it is the British, the Americans or the French, the West benefits from the land and resources that exist in Africa, while the people remain in poverty, ravaged by disease and mired in wars. Mr. Muhammad said the Wikileaks cables reveal a modernization of the methods used to subdue the African continent with the overarching goal of continued hegemonic rule. “These cables demonstrate that Africa is still under Western control,” Mr. Muhammad told The Final Call. With Western powers still choosing Africa's leaders, they manipulate internal organizations to achieve their desired results and get rid of leaders who are not compliant with their foreign policy objectives, Mr. Muhammad said, adding that it is simply the modern proof of an old Western strategy of imperialism. Neither Africans nor Blacks in the United States should wait for an apology from the Western powers, nor any sincere attempt to right historical wrongs through reparations because the West still benefits economically and politically, he said. “Slavery never really ended,” said Mr. Muhammad. “In their mind, they never stopped using and abusing us. They never stopped, so how are you going to apologize for something that you are still doing? They never stopped so it's farcical for them to apologize.” Attempts at increased Western control and influence in different parts of the globe appear throughout the Wikileaks documents, however, the desire to influence the political and military realities in Africa are among the most glaring examples of this dynamic at work. Disparaging comments listed in Wikileaks files by former U.S. Ambassador Chris Dell, who left Harare in 2007, paint a troubling picture of America's view of the situation in Zimbabwe. Although named specifically in Mr. Dell's memos, Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai would not comment on Amb. Dell's words about him in the leaked cables. However, Rugare Gumbo, a spokesman for President Robert Mugabe's ZANU- PF party, said Amb. Dell's words were clear evidence of “a regime change agenda” to oust Mr. Mugabe and install a puppet leader to replace the man who has led Zimbabwe for over 30 years. Other cables from the U.S. State Department show an interest in the agricultural policies in Burundi, the Republic of Congo, and Rwanda, perhaps in preparation for the export of genetically modified foods and continued rape of the land and its resources. And the stories of corruption keep on coming: Unrelated to Wikileaks but another example of the U.S. and its insatiable appetite for oil and resources, former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney and the oil services firm Halliburton Co. has been charged with 16 counts of bribery by Nigeria's anti- corruption police. Femi Babafemi a spokesman for Nigeria's Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, says Mr. Cheney's firm allegedly paid $180 million to government officials to win a contract to build a $6 billion natural gas plant in the oil-rich southern delta. The militarization of Africa via the U.S. Pentagon's United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) starting in October 2007 has been criticized since its inception by activists and political commentators citing another attempt at Western hegemonic influence in the region. In the Somalian conflict, the West ostensibly supports an 8,000-strong African Union peacekeeping mission charged with protecting the embattled government operating out of the capital of Mogadishu, however the insurgents have continued to fight. Wikileaks documents show Yemen's president Ali Abdullah Saleh, telling top NATO commander General David Petraeus that his country would publicly state American missile strikes against a supposed Al-Qaeda-linked group were conducted by Yemen's own military forces, even though NATO forces were behind the attacks. Citing a cable he read in Wikileaks from a U.S. diplomat to the Ukrainian government questioning whether a shipment of tanks marked for Kenya was in fact going to Sudan, in the correspondence, the U.S. portrayed itself as an innocent dupe, when in reality, it is the world's largest weapons supplier to combatants in conflicts raging globally. “America orchestrates all of these military transactions,” said Mr. Abdul-Ali.“During this comprehensive peace agreement, in Sudan, both sides agreed not to rearm. But the United States has been arming and facilitating the delivery of arms through third parties like Chad or Israel in order to escalate the military tension. It is shameful and this is just one small incident in terms of how America has conducted its foreign policy,” Mr. Abdul-Ali added. U.S. damage control efforts While refusing to cite any specific examples, U.S. Department of Defense spokesman Col. Dave Lapan said there are indications that foreign powers are “pulling back” from their dealings with the U.S. following the release of diplomatic cables. According to the Associated Press, Col. Lapan told reporters “believing the U.S. is not good at keeping secrets ... certainly changes things” and “generally, there has been a retrenchment” in cooperation. After the U.S. halted talks with Israel regarding continued West Bank settlement construction and the resumption of peace talks with the Palestinians, in somewhat critical remarks, Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak told a parliamentary committee the American government was too consumed with Wikileaks fallout and increased tensions between North and South Korea. U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder said the U.S. had been put at risk by the publication of the diplomatic documents released by WikiLeaks and recently announced the authorization of a criminal investigation. The House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hold a Dec. 16 hearing on the potential application of U.S. espionage laws and constitutional issues raised by Wikileaks. Although U.S. President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton initially attempted to downplay the information revealed in the leaked files, an embarrassing picture of American “diplomacy” is emerging. There is evidence to believe the Obama administration is worried other damaging information may come to light in subsequent weeks. Mr. Abdul-Ali believes there is more to come and for the U.S. government, the embarrassing revelations are sure to continue. “The United States empire is crumbling right in front of us, and they have been—up until now— successful in bullying countries through financial institutions, through the military and through cultural domination and on all her fronts, they are being challenged in an unprecedented manner,” said Mr. Abdul-Ali. “It's another example of how we the people have to be vigilant, with regards to the conduct of the American government. It is a wake- up call around the world. Other governments around the world are seeing this,” he added. |
| Obama’s Drone Escalation War Crime? President Obama is pursuing a dangerous and reckless course of action in Pakistan hoping to get a lucky kill on a top level terrorist that he can turn into political domestic advantage. While the Obama administration is complaining about the Bush administration giving a few admitted terrorists some pain, his reckless policy of escalating drone attacks in Pakistan has falsely claimed to have killed many terrorists but instead has only inflamed the Pakistani population against the U.S. Ironically his decisions may put him at risk of being labeled a war criminal by the international community. Read complete story HERE! |

| Silent Screams: The Impact of U.S. Drone Attacks Silent Screams deftly interweaves exclusive footage of tribal villagers in Iran with families in neighboring Afghanistan and Pakistan. Explicit scenes detail civilian suffering in war-torn Afghanistan and Pakistan as a result of bombardments by drones, 'unmanned aerial vehicles' controlled remotely by pilots thousands of miles away inside the U.S. Spotlighting the destructive costs of U.S. wars, this documentary adroitly binds the plight of civilian victims abroad with the countless Americans whose vital needs go unmet as a result of spiraling military spending. Silent Screams echoes the desperation around the globe for victims without a voice. Visit www.silentscreams.info for information and educational kits to cultivate action and demand real change in how your tax dollars are spen |


| Recommended News links to the best journalism on the web. Open and fair journalism is very essential to a free and democratic society Please visit and support the news organizations to the left Thank You from the editor of Rink-a-Dink Productions |
| by Alison Weir In Jan. 13 the Atlanta Jewish Times featured a column by its owner-publisher suggesting that Israel might someday need to “order a hit” on the president of the United States. In the column, publisher Andrew Adler describes a scenario in which Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu would need to “give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel.” The purpose? So that the vice president could then take office and dictate U.S. policies that would help the Jewish state “obliterate its enemies.” Adler wrote that it is highly likely that the idea “has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles.” Numerous Jewish leaders quickly condemned Adler, who has now apologized for the column, resigned, and put the newspaper up for sale. An Israeli columnist noted that the hatred being stirred up against Obama is similar to conditions in Israel that led to the murder of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin by a Jewish extremist. Many of those criticizing Adler claim that he defamed Israel by suggesting that it would ever do such a thing. Abe Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL),proclaimed: “There is absolutely no excuse, no justification, no rationalization for this kind of rhetoric. It doesn’t even belong in fiction.” In reality, however, Adler’s expectation that Israel’s inner circles have explored such a course of action, and would be willing to undertake it, may be entirely accurate. The fact is that Israel has killed and plotted to assassinate people throughout the world; a number have been Americans. One alleged plot was chillingly similar to Adler’s suggestion. There is evidence that in 1991 an Israeli undercover team planned to assassinate a U.S. president. The intended victim was George Herbert Walker Bush. The first person to write of the plot was a former 11- term Republican congressman from Illinois, Paul Findley. In a 1992 article in the Washington Report for Middle East Affairs, Findley described the alleged scheme and how it was revealed. Findley wrote that the U.S. Secret Service had received a warning that elements of Israel’s spy agency might target Bush when he went to Madrid for the opening day of the peace conference to be held that year. According to Findley, a former Mossad agent named Victor Ostrovsky, who had written a book exposing Israel’s spy agency, told a group of Canadian parliamentarians that he had received secret intelligence suggesting that the “the Mossad’s hatred of Bush — and support for Vice President Dan Quayle — might lead to an attempt on the president’s life.” Israel considered Quayle much closer to Israel than Bush. Bush had particularly angered Israel by attempting to pressure Israel into ending its illegal settlement expansion on confiscated Palestinian land by withholding loan guarantees until Israel ended this practice. Findley wrote that Ostrovsky’s statements were relayed to Findley’s friend and former colleague Paul “Pete” McCloskey, a prominent former Republican congressman from California who had recently been named by Bush to the National and Community Service Commission. McCloskey, a decorated Marine veteran and graduate of Stanford Law School who had at one time been considered a presidential contender, flew to Ottawa to debrief Ostrovsky in person and evaluate his information. Findley reported that Ostrovsky told McCloskey that the Mossad wanted “to do everything possible to preserve a state of war between Israel and its neighbors, assassinating President Bush, if necessary.” Ostrovsky said that a PR campaign was already underway in both Israel and the United States to “prepare public acceptance of Dan Quayle as president.” Convinced that Ostrovsky was legitimate and his information significant, McCloskey jumped on the next flight to Washington, where he reported Ostrovsky’s intelligence to the Secret Service and State Department. The apparent plot never went forward, perhaps because Ostrovsky and McCloskey had given it away. Ostrovsky gave more details about the plot two years later in his 1994 book, The Other Side of Deception: A Rogue Agent Exposes the Mossad’s Secret Agenda, published by HarperCollins. In the book, Ostrovsky wrote that an extremist group within Mossad was responsible for the plan. He said they kept the plan secret from then–Israeli Prime MinisterYitzhak Shamir, though they believed that Shamir would have ordered such a hit himself if he hadn’t been constrained by politics. In the lead-up to Israel’s 1948 founding war, Shamir had headed up a terrorist group known for its assassinations. In his review of Ostrovsky’s book, Ambassador Andrew Killgore, a retired career foreign service officer and publisher of the Washington Report, called the book an “insider’s probing exposé of some Middle East realities that have been hidden too long from all but Israeli eyes.” Ostrovsky wrote that the Israelis planned a “false flag” operation, in which they would pin the assassination on Palestinians. They kidnapped three Palestinian militants from Beirut who were to be the scapegoats, took them to Israel’s Negev desert, and held them incommunicado. “Meanwhile,” Killgore writes, “Mossad-generated threats on the president’s life, seemingly from Palestinians, were leaked. These were designed to throw suspicion on the organization of rogue Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal. Names and descriptions of the three terrorists were leaked to Spanish police so that, if the plot was successful, blame would automatically fall on them.” Ostrovsky reports that after the assassination plot was eventually canceled, the three Palestinian prisoners were “terminated.” Targeting Americans If the plot had gone forward, this would not have been the first time that Israel targeted Americans for death. Nor would it be the first false-flag operation. • In 1954 the Mossad planned to firebomb American installations, libraries, and other gathering places in Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood was to be blamed for the attacks, thus causing American animosity toward Egypt. An accidental early detonation of one of the devices caused the plot, known as the Lavon Affair, to unravel before it could kill or mutilate the intended Americans. • In 1967 Israeli air and sea forces perpetrated an almost two-hour assault in which they tried to sink a U. S. Navy ship with a crew of 300. While the attack failed to sink the ship, it succeeded in killing 34 Americans and injuring 174. Some analysts have conjectured that this was also a false-flag operation; it is highly likely that Egypt would have been blamed for the attack if the ship had gone down. • In 1973 Israeli fighter pilots were ordered to shoot down an unarmed U.S. reconnaissance plane (at the time the U.S. was delivering massive weaponry to Israel to prevent it from losing the “Yom Kippur War” with Egypt and Syria). While the Israelis were unable to reach the altitude of the U.S. plane, they did manage that same year to shoot down a civilian Libyan airliner that had strayed over Israeli territory, killing 104 men, women, and children. One was an American. • In 1990 a Canadian-American scientist and father of seven, Gerald Bull, was assassinated in Belgium. All indications are that it was an Israeli Mossad hit team that drilled five bullets into the back of his head and neck. (Israel has assassinated a number of scientists of various nationalities. The most recent is a 32-year- old father of a young son from Iran.) • In 2003 it came out that Israeli leaders had officially decided to undertake assassination operations on U. S. soil. An FBI spokesman, queried about the Israeli plans, said only: “This is a policy matter. We only enforce federal laws.” • In recent years a growing number of American peace activists have been intentionally killed, maimed, and injured by Israeli forces, including 23-year-old Rachel Corrie, 21-year-old Brian Avery, 37-year-old Tristan Anderson, 21-year-old Emily Henochowicz, and 21- year-old Furkan Dogan. All of this has been minimally reported in the U.S. press. While major news organizations from England to Israel to Australia covered the Jewish Times’ apparent endorsement of a possible Israeli assassination of a U.S. president, the scandal has been largely missing from U.S. media. Even Atlanta’s AP bureau inexplicably initially decided not to write a report on it, only finally sending out a story many days later. Such news omissions concerning Israeli partisans are not rare. In 2004 a fanatic Israel loyalist wrote a letter saying that he was going to burn down Presbyterian churcheswhile worshippers were inside (he was furious at the Presbyterian Church’s decision to divest from companies profiting from the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian land). This grisly threat also received minimal media play. Despite Israeli violence against Americans (even while American taxpayers have given far more of our tax money to Israel than to any other nation) American presidential candidates, with the exception of Ron Paul, continue to vie over who is most devoted to Israel. It is ironic that Adler considers Obama so bad for Israel, given that Israeli analystshave rated him second only to Mitt Romney in his fidelity to Israel. And Obama has now released a seven-minute video that may catapult our first African-American president into first place in pandering to an apartheid nation. Perhaps he’ll be safe from assassins. |

| The Mossad and 9/11 by Gordon Thomas Globe-Intel 6/17/02 The complex and often uneasy relationship between Israel's Mossad and the U.S. intelligence community is emerging as a prime reason for the catastrophic failure of the CIA and FBI to act on advance warnings of an impending attack on America. Eight days before the September 11 attack, Egypt's senior intelligence chief, Omar Suleiman, informed the CIA station chief in Cairo that "credible sources" had told him that Osama bin-Laden's network was "in the advanced stages of executing a significant operation against an American target." Prior to that, the FBI whistleblower Coleen Rowley had revealed, there was a similar warning from French intelligence. Both warnings, Globe-Intel has established, originally came from Mossad. The Israeli intelligence service chose to pass on its own intelligence to Washington through its contacts in French and Egyptian intelligence agencies because it did not believe its previous warnings on an impending attack by the bin-Laden network had been taken seriously enough in Washington. Part of the reason has already emerged by President Bush acknowledging for the first time there had been a serious breakdown between the twin pillars of the U.S. intelligence community – the FBI and CIA. "In terms of whether or not the FBI and the CIA were communicating properly, I think it is clear that they weren't," he has said. Behind this admission is the long-standing suspicion that both the FBI and CIA have about Mossad and its ongoing activities in the United States. Ostensibly, Israel denies it has ever spied on its most powerful ally. But the reality is otherwise. Both the FBI and CIA regard Mossad as a clear and present danger to U.S. national security. It places the Israeli spy agency just below the espionage totem pole that has China's Secret Intelligence Service at its top. A full ten months before Mossad started to sound its own warnings against bin-Laden, senior officials in both the FBI and CIA saw them as "blowing smoke" to divert attention from Mossad's own activities in the United States. Evidence of this may well be contained in the more than 350,000 documents that the CIA has already turned over to the hearings of the Senate and House of Representatives intelligence committees. These are now underway in sound-proofed rooms before 37 members of those committees. Already, in the atmosphere of leak and counter-leak in Washington, the consensus is emerging on Capitol Hill that the U.S. intelligence community had enough data to have been able to prevent the September 11 attacks. Richard Shelby, the senior Republican on the Senate intelligence committee has spoken about "a massive intelligence failure." A hint of the extent of that failure has come from Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak. He has spoken of "a secret agent who was in close contact with the bin- Laden organisation." Globe-Intel has been told that the "agent" was in fact the senior Mossad source who tipped off Egypt's intelligence chief, Omar Suleiman, that an attack on America was coming. During last year, senior Egyptian officials have told Globe-Intel there were five separate contacts between Suleiman and his Mossad counterpart, Efraim Halevy. Understandably, Israeli government sources in Tel Aviv have denied such contacts. But an official close to Mubarak have confirmed that they did take place. Mubarak's public statements on the matter – the first ranking statesman to break cover over the building controversy of who-knew-what-and-when, will at minimum be seen as clear indications that there were lapses in the interpretations of both the CIA and FBI. Coupled to the warnings that Mossad arranged to be passed through French intelligence and which Coleen Rowley has used to lambaste her chief, FBI director Robert Mueller, the failure to act assumes frightening proportions. The revelations make a mockery of George Tenet's claim that he was "proud" of the CIA's record. Its embattled director, currently in Israel trying to broker a doomed peace deal, has found in his absence that his own staff are admitting to mistakes. "Part of the problem is that the CIA and FBI are loath to share vital information with each other, or with other government agencies because they have this deep-seated fear of compromising their own sources," a senior State Department analyst told Globe-Intel. But in the coming days the relationship between Mossad and the CIA and FBI will become the subject of close scrutiny in the closed hearings of the intelligence committees picking their way through the mass of documents now in their possession. It is beginning to emerge that intelligence relating to pre-September 11 stopped at the desk of National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice. The question as to why the President was not fully briefed has led to others. Had a decision been taken by Rice in consultation with Secretary of Defense and other high-ranking members of the Bush Administration to effectively not inform Bush of what was developing because they did not trust his limited experience in dealing with global terrorism – or a major threat of any kind? Officially such a question is dismissed around the White House as nonsensical. Yet it persists within the State Department – where Secretary of State Colin Powell remains outside the charmed inner circle surrounding Bush. There, senior officials point to the fact that the CIA briefing to Bush last August, less than a month before the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, turned out to be conspicuous by what was not said. Yet, at that time the CIA knew of the impending threat. There are other pointers that the President may have been kept out of the loop. Within his own circle there is a determination to distance him from taking the advice of his father. President George Bush Snr is seen by some in the White House as being out of touch with todays world. And that the advice he proffers his son during their Texas cookouts is out-moded. All this may go some way to explain why President Bush has now publicly acknowledged there was an intelligence failure. Much else will flow from that. GORDON THOMAS is the author of forty-three books. Seven of them are major motion pictures including five times Academy Award-nominated Voyage of the Damned; Enola Gay, which won the Emmy Awards Foreign Critics Prize. His books of best-selling David Morton novels are being filmed by IAC International as a 22-hour television series to be screened worldwide in 2003. His Gideon's Spies: Mossad's Secret Warriors became a major documentary for Channel Four which he wrote and narrated. It followed three years of research during which he was given unprecedented access to the Mossad's key personnel. The book has so far been published in 16 languages. Gordon Thomas lives in Ireland, with his wife. |
| WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will host a talk show on a Russian TV network |
| WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who has championed the exposure of government secrets, is getting his own TV show — on a network bankrolled by the Russian government. Assange will host a talk show on the Kremlin-backed RT news network starting in March, focusing on what the network said in an announcement Wednesday is “his favorite topic: controversy.” WikiLeaks, Assange’s Web site, has posted classified U.S. military documents and videos, as well as American diplomatic cables that were apparently taken from classified U.S. databases. In a news release, WikiLeaks said the Australian-born Assange, 40, will host 10 half-hour conversations with “key political players, thinkers and revolutionaries from around the world.” The content and guests remain “secret for now,” according to RT (formerly known as Russia Today). One potential production problem: Assange is under house arrest in Britain and is fighting extradition to Sweden, where he is facing sexual assault allegations by two women. He has denied the charges. His legal troubles have strained WikiLeaks’ financial resources. In interviews in late 2010, Assange threatened to release documents about Russia and other “repressive regimes” but never followed up. Western news organizations and some Russians have called RT a propaganda arm of the Kremlin. The English-language network — whose slogan is “Question more” — is aired throughout the Washington area by MHz Networks, a Falls Church- based educational broadcaster that carries channels from Japan, France and other countries. MHz is also carried by satellite and cable systems that reach about 35 million homes across the country. While U.S. officials have been harshly critical of WikiLeaks and Assange, he appears to be viewed differently in Russia. In December 2010, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin called Assange’s detention in Britain undemocratic. The Guardian newspaper of London quoted a source close to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that same month suggesting that Assange should be nominated for a Nobel Prize. In addition to the publicity WikiLeaks has received, many Americans are familiar with Assange because of a parody of him on “Saturday Night Live,” on which he was played several times by actor-comedian Bill Hader. Watch video on upcoming show |
